Shorts at San Sebastian Film Festival a disappointment
In between going to follow the Italian Retrospective I added two sessions of the shorts being shown at the San Sebastian Film Festival.
The first was led by Southern Brides – the information we
had in the guide said it would be about:
“Mature women discuss marriage, their first time, their
intimate relationship with sexuality. By repeating these ancient rites, the
director questions her lack of wedlock, children and, with it, a chain of
disappearing mother-daughter relations.”
Good films, whether long or short have a good ark to describe
the story they want to tell. Southern Brides did not have that. It would have
benefitted from an overview by the filmmaker explaining the intent and what
the film was perhaps an ending where she brought together the message, she
wanted people to take away.
The film was disjointed, and the interviewer clearly had her
thoughts which she would at times try and impose on the people she was
interviewing. It didn’t clearly keep to the structure of what she was trying to
show in the film, so the interviews just seemed mixed together. It didn’t highlight
as it clearly intended the issue of “disappearing mother-daughter relations.” It could with much better editing and framing have
been an interesting story, but it was not and at 40 minutes so long.
Across the Waters by contrast a 15-minute short you wanted to have more from. Its story was that a :
“Sandstorm blows, water becomes scarce. In a remote mining
town without any radio signals, a quirky teenage girl gets curious about a
passing truck driver.”
Good acting from all the actors particularly the girl played
by Yuxin Yang. It was a desolate film backdrop and a visitor truck driver who
had the first Walkman she had ever seen and then the music she had the chance
to listen to. It laid the foundation for her wanting to leave and go to a big
city. He wouldn’t take her, but you left the film feeling there was so much
more story that could be told.
The second set of shorts I went to see was a set of
propaganda films by the Instituto Cubano del Arte e Industria Cinematográficos
(ICAIC) there were five films I walked out after four. The ones I saw were:
·
Treasure Island – “A look at the Isle of Pines since
its discovery, construction of the Modelo Prison for offenders and
revolutionaries and how a new society was built there in the 60s with the
participation of young people.”
·
L.B.J. – “Political satire-cum-historical and
educational rundown of violence in the USA under the mandate of Lyndon B.
Johnson, from 1963 to 1969. Reusing a variety of archive footage and
interviews, the film analyses US policy, by looking back at the murders of Martin
Luther King Jr., John and Bob Kennedy.”
·
79 Springs – “Through the life of Vietnam leader
Ho Chi Minh, poet, guerrilla fighter, statesman, we see the age-old struggle of
his people against all empires who tried to conquer it, and the pain unleashed
by his death.”
·
Prayer for Marilyn Monroe – “A reading of the poem Oración por Marilyn Monroe, by the Nicaraguan poet Ernesto Cardenal, serves to connect the fatal demise of the mythical actress with the misery and exploitation of American childhood. An icon of popular culture, images of Marilyn Monroe are reappropriated and given a new meaning based on editing as a symbol of imperialist oppression and humiliation. The prayer is not only for the goddess of cinema but for all humanity.”The subject matter looked fascinating the films were some of the worst shorts I have ever seen. No arcs, just images and depressing music. None of the films was it clear what the director was trying to do. Treasure Island offered a look at Cuba and how it developed over time. This seemed to be the easiest film to make. The film-makers managed to create an unwatchable film.
Perhaps Marilyn Monroe had a structure in the poem but the film's decisions on what was shown were terrible.
I am fascinated by the story of Ho Chi Minh and how he
tried to get a meeting with President Eisenhower and the Dulles brothers
stopped it have happening. Definitely worth reading the excellent Dulles
Brothers book. There is a very good film that needs to be made about Ho Chi
Minh this 79 Springs, wasn’t it. The L.B.J. film was again full of images and depressing
music and didn’t even get close to an explanation of who he was. It focused on
the war and that is a legitimate focus but underneath the images is a story
that could have been told around not just the position he took on the war but
also the opposition. The use of Martin Luther King and Bobby Kennedy's assassinations
without putting into context their opposition to the war just made the
inclusion shallow. Showing with JFK that America is a violent place but without
explaining the backdrop so the person watching might understand better the
narrative that the film-maker is trying to make means it was again a hugely disappointing
film.
Comments
Post a Comment