UNEP GLobal Resources Outlook 2024 - by the UNEP, International Resource Panel (IRP)
The world is in the midst of a triple planetary crisis of climate change, biodiversity loss and pollution and waste. The global economy is consuming ever more natural resources, while the world is not on track to meet the Sustainable Development Goals.
UNEP Press Release
Rich countries use six times more resources and generate 10 times the climate impacts than low-income ones.
The extraction of the Earth’s natural resources tripled in the past five decades, related to
the massive build-up of infrastructure in many parts of the world and the high
levels of material consumption, especially in upper-middle and high-income
countries. Material extraction is expected to rise by 60 per cent by 2060 and
could derail efforts to achieve not only global climate, biodiversity, and
pollution targets but also economic prosperity and human well-being, according
to a report published today by the UN Environment Programme (UNEP)-hosted
International Resource Panel.
The 2024 Global Resource Outlook,
developed by the International Resource Panel with authors from around the
globe and launched during the sixth session of the UN Environment Assembly,
calls for sweeping policy changes to bring humanity to live within its means
and reduce this projected growth in resource use by one third, while growing
the economy, improving well-being, and minimizing environmental
impacts.
The report finds that growth in resource use
since 1970 from 30 to 106 billion tonnes – or from 23 to 39 kilogrammes of
materials used on average per person per day – has dramatic environmental
impacts. Overall, resource extraction and processing account for over 60 per
cent of planet-warming emissions and for 40 per cent of health-related impacts
of air pollution.
The extraction and processing of biomass
(e.g., agricultural crops and forestry) accounts for 90 per cent of
land-related biodiversity loss and water stress, as well as one-third of
greenhouse gas emissions. Similarly, extraction and processing of fossil fuels,
metals and non-metallic minerals (e.g., sand, gravel, clay) together account
for 35 per cent of global emissions.
“The triple planetary crisis of climate
change, nature loss and pollution is driven from a crisis of unsustainable
consumption and production. We must work with nature, instead of merely
exploiting it,” said Inger Andersen, Executive Director of UNEP. “Reducing the
resource intensity of mobility, housing, food and energy systems is the only
way we can achieve the Sustainable Development Goals and ultimately a just and
liveable planet for all.”
At the heart of global resource use are fundamental
inequalities: low-income countries
consume six times less materials and generate 10 times less climate impacts
than those living in high-income countries. Upper middle-income countries have
more than doubled resource use in the past 50 years due to their own growth in
infrastructure and the relocation of resource intensive processes from
high-income countries. At the same time, per capita resource use and related
environmental impacts in low-income countries has remained relatively low and
almost unchanged since 1995.
Where
consumption levels are very high,
greater focus on lowering resource and material consumption levels to
complement action on production and resource efficiency can reduce around 30
per cent of global resource use as compared to historical trends, while growing
the global economy, improving lives, and staying within planetary
boundaries.
Where
resource use needs to grow, strategies
can be put in place to maximise the value of each unit of resource used and
meet human needs in ways that are not resource intensive, so that the benefits
of resource use far outpace the rate of their extraction and the environmental
and health impacts stay in line with international obligations on climate,
biodiversity, and sustainability.
Incorporating environmental externalities in
trade agreements, strengthening regulation of financial commodity markets, and
putting in place impact related border adjustment policies are just some of the
ways that countries
can prevent a race to the bottom on environmental and social standards of
resource extraction, and maximise and retain the value from extraction
processes in country.
“We should not accept that meeting human needs
must be resource intensive, and we must stop stimulating extraction-based
economic success. With decisive action by politicians and the private sector, a
decent life for all is possible without costing the earth,” said Janez
Potočnik, the International Resource Panel’s Co-Chair.
“Last year’s climate conference agreed to
transition away from fossil fuels. Now is the time to bring everyone to the
table to phase up solutions to make that possible. Now is the time to phase up
resource-based solutions for climate, biodiversity and equity so that everyone,
everywhere can live a life in dignity,” said Izabella Teixeira, the
International Resource Panel’s Co-Chair.
Specific recommendations include:
Institutionalizing
resource governance and defining resource use paths especially the consideration of sustainable resource use
in strategies to implement Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs) and
improving the ability of countries to benchmark and set targets for resource
consumption and productivity. Directing
finance towards sustainable resource use by reflecting the true
costs of resources in the structure of the economy (i.e., subsidies,
regulation, taxes, nudges, infrastructure, and planning). Additional
recommendations include channelling private finance towards sustainable
resource use and incorporating resource-related risk into Public and Central
Bank mandates.
Mainstreaming
sustainable consumption options by
making sure consumers have the right information, have access to and are able
to afford sustainable goods and services. Such measures must be coupled with
regulation to disincentivize or ban resource-intensive options (like
non-essential single use plastic products).
Making
trade an engine of sustainable resource use by creating a level playing field where the true
environmental and social costs of goods are reflected in prices by introducing
MEAs into trade agreements, for example.
Creating
circular, resource-efficient and low impact solutions, and business models to include refuse, reduce, eco-design, reuse,
repair, and recycling, as well as supportive regulation and evaluation of
existing systems.
Implemented together, these policies can transform the built environment,
mobility, food, and energy systems, resulting in an upsurge in renewable
energies and energy efficiency, decarbonization of material production, more
walkable and cyclable cities with better public transportation and remote work
opportunities, as well as reduced food loss and waste. High- and upper-middle
income countries would see a dietary shift away from animal protein and more
compact cities, while lower-income economies would experience a rise in
resource use to enable dignified living.
Such systemic shifts are projected to peak resource
extraction by 2040 and then decrease use to only 20 per cent above 2020 levels
by 2060. Greenhouse gas
emissions would drop by over 80 per cent, stocks of transport-related materials
and building materials would fall by 50 and 25 per cent respectively, and
land-use for agriculture would fall by 5 per cent. Concurrently, food production
would increase by 40 per cent, to support populations, even where there
is growth and food security, the global economy would grow by 3 per cent, and
the Human Development Index would improve by 7 per cent, boosting incomes and
well-being.
Given the failure so far to deliver on many policy commitments in MEAs and the urgency of the triple planetary crisis, the report supports immediate actions, following the principle of ‘best available science.’
NOTES TO EDITORS
About the UN Environment Programme (UNEP)
UNEP is
the leading global voice on the environment. It provides leadership and
encourages partnership in caring for the environment by inspiring, informing
and enabling nations and peoples to improve their quality of life without
compromising that of future generations.
About the International Resource Panel (IRP)
The IRP was
launched in 2007 by UNEP to establish a science-policy interface on the
sustainable use of natural resources and in particular their environmental
impacts over the full life cycle. The Panel consists of eminent scientists with
expertise in resource management issues. It studies key questions around global
resource use and produces assessment reports that distill the latest
scientific, technical, and socio-economic findings to inform
decision-making.
Comments
Post a Comment