A New Disruptive Political World: Are we going to see major global realignments?
This blog has published stories expressing concerns about the
emerging disruptive industries and their impact on implementing the SDGs. In
particular, raising concerns that this will lead to an increase in
inequality and unemployment.
Linked to this is the worry that governments were not preparing
themselves for what could be considerable change over the coming 15 years
nor were they having a conversation with their voters about the changes. You
can just see the changes happening daily in so many areas of our life whether
it is the driverless cars, the Sophia robots or the 3d printing of houses –
these will all mean loss of jobs.
One way to prepare for this would be a UN Commission to look at
the impact of disruptive industries. But of course, this was before the recent
US election.
We now have major disruptive forces in our political world as well
and soon as they start playing out it will add to changes in our economic world
as well.
It seems clear to me that a form of economic nationalism is on the
rise and that at present the moderating forces have no answer.
Much of this can be traced back to the impact of globalization and
that not enough was done to help those that it left behind. This was coupled
with the 2008 financial crisis which saw some of the same people impacted again
and what was the response of the ruling political class? Except in
Iceland very few of the bankers that caused the problems were held responsible
and they continued to give huge bonus to the same people who caused
the problem.
If we move forward to 2016 then it is perhaps not surprising to
have seen Brexit in the UK and the support for Sanders in the Democrat Party
and Trump in the Republican Party. It seemed like the political class were
surprised when Trump won the Presidency on a ticket of xenophobia. sexism and
'drain the swamp'.
We are now in the first few weeks of the new administration and it
seems every day there is a new disruption. There isn’t time to full debate a
policy or a tweet before the next one comes out.
Realignment
The world is changing if we look at what President Trump has said
or inferred:
1. NATO: I said a long time ago that NATO had
problems," he said in the interview.
"Number one it was obsolete, because it was designed many,
many years ago,
"Number two the countries weren't paying what they're
supposed to be paying," adding that this was unfair to the United States.
As of the 2nd of February, have open conflict in the
Ukraine and it is unclear what the response will be from a Trump Administration.
Or if there can be a response from NATO
2. Russia: “They
have sanctions on Russia — let’s see if we can make some good deals with
Russia,” he said. “For one thing, I think nuclear weapons should be way down
and reduced very substantially, that’s part of it. Russia’s hurting very badly
right now because of sanctions, but I think something can happen that a lot of
people are going to benefit” Trump.
Throughout the Presidential election, Trump has indicated he wants
a close relationship with Putin.
3. United Nations: The President is expected to issue an Executive Order he hopes to
decrease U.S. funding in organizations by at least 40 percent, The Times
reported.
This will have huge impacts not the least with UNFPA, funding for
the Green Climate Fund and any UN body that questions the President.
4. The UN Security Council: The five veto power countries have traditionally
fallen into two camps: France, the U.K. and the U.S., referred to as the P3, on
one side and Russia and China on the other. Is this now going to change as we
could be seeing a US-Russia axis.
5. Geopolitical realignment: If the US moves towards Russia what
will the EU do? Are
we about to see a massive realignment? The European countries do not trust the
US now with Russia. European Union President Donald Tusk says China,
Russia and the U.S. administration of President Donald Trump are among the top
external threats facing the bloc.
Will the EU response be to start to work much more closely with
China?
Sitting in Brussels the EU, must be starting to plan to approach
China to develop closer relationships. In particular, to try and create a more
stable geo political world. This might require accepting a larger role for
China by Europe. In a disruptive world, you look for stable partners.
At the same time, will they be reaching out to support Mexico and
Canada to help them through this destabilizing period?
This blog started by pointing out that the world was facing series
problems with the emerging disruptive industries if we add to that a disruptive
geo political world then it is not surprising that the Doomsday Clock is now 2
½ minutes to “midnight,” according to the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists.
We live in an increasingly insecure world. It’s at these times
that we need strong and robust multilateral intergovernmental organizations.
Comments
Post a Comment