Who should lead WHO?
It’s been a busy week in New York with the Heads of State meetings and so it was only at the airport that yesterday that I saw the latest news that six candidates have been nominated for the next Director General of the World Health Organization.
The five candidates are:
She has served as temporary advisor to the World Health Organization, on more than 20 occasions and is a board member of the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, and is co-chair of the WHO Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity. She is currently a Board member for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, and previously served as chair of their Evaluation Advisory Committee.
Before that he was mayor of Lourdes 1989–2000 and mayor of Toulouse 2001–2004.
Dr Bustreo's work has focused on policy development concerning child and maternal health, policy implementation and partnership-building with a wide range of stakeholders. In 2010, she led the development of the United Nations Global Strategy for Women’s and Children’s Health. In 2008, she contributed to the High Level Taskforce on International Innovative Financing for Health Systems and in 2005, to the UN Taskforce on Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) 4 & 5 to reduce maternal and child mortality.
The most important reform intervention was the implementation of a radical public health regulatory framework with popular support. This included the full ban of smoking in public and workplaces, introduction of public health product tax on food and beverages with added sugar or salt and safety limitation of trans fat content of food. The money generated from public health product tax contributed to the salary raise of public employees of the health care sector, and considerably slowed down the international migration trends of Hungarian health labor force. During the four years he introduced central capacity planning for rationalization and regionalization of the health care provision system and designed new efficient patient pathways, laying down the frameworks of a national health service
In December 2015, Nabarro was appointed Special Adviser on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.
At least twice -- with the ongoing cholera epidemic in Haiti and the 2014-2015 Ebola epidemic in West Africa - Nabarro has been tapped by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to lead the institution's responses to health crises after the UN and the international community had been faulted for delayed and inadequate action.
Also in 2015, WHO appointed Nabarro as chairman of the Advisory Group on Reform of WHO’s Work in Outbreaks and Emergencies with Health and Humanitarian Consequences.
January 2009, Nabarro was given the responsibility of coordinating the United Nations system’s High-Level Task Force on Global Food Security (HLTF) and tasked them with establishing a common strategy for addressing food and nutrition insecurity in a more sustainable, coordinated and comprehensive way.
In October 2009 United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon appointed Nabarro as Special Representative on Food Security and Nutrition.
In September 2005, Nabarro was seconded from WHO and appointed Senior United Nations System Coordinator for Avian and Human Influenza by Secretary-General of the United Nations Kofi Annan to ensure that the United Nations system makes an effective and coordinated contribution to the global effort to control the epidemic of avian influenza (or “bird flu”). He held this role at United Nations Headquarters in New York from 2005 until 2014
WHO critical to future challenges
A number of the candidate above look very capable to be head of WHO and I have to say researching this blog i was very impressed with Dr. Sania Nishtar.
WHO is critical to the challenges that we will face over the coming years in particular the Antimicrobial Resistance. As well as delivering the SDG on Health and the associated interlinkakes it has with other SDGs.
WHO has been asked to cope with real urgent challenges such as Ebolla and the cholera epidemic in Haiti. IT does need retooling as an organziation for tomorrows challenges and a real review of its structures. Reuters in February did a review of WHO it highlighted the need to "Streamline ts complex structure, governance and financing to make it more efficient." Reform has been very very slow. And though it has addressed challenges when they have come up its structure we has not helped.
The above graph indicates where WHOs funding comes from and if you look at the graph below then you see how much funding is voluntary and how much of that voluntary is focused at the particular issue a donor wants to fund.
What this means is that the funding is not focused at what member states think are the priorities but what the donors think are.
What is need is an Director General of WHO who will overhaul the organziation with a clear programme of work a clear line of accountability and a budget that gives the organziation flexibility to address new challenges. This is in part how it was set up in 1948. It acts often not as one organization but seven with WHO HQ and its seven regional directors. These directors are NOT responsible to the Director General but their own Regional Assemblies. This has to stop. But this isn't WHOs fault it is member states who need to agree in each of the regional bodies to agree to one line of management and that should be to the next Director General.
WHO should lead WHO?
The person who becomes the next Director General of WHO has to understand all the problems and be prepared to address them. This brings me to a comment on who I think has that skill base and the knowledge to address these challenges.
Whenever there has been a health problem over the last ten years whichever Secretary General has been in office there is only one person who they went to to head the team and that was David Nabarro. He has continued to show that leadership as the Special Adviser on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.ReplyDelete