Why those attending the Gates Foundation are addressing the SDGs and how the media is not helpful
It is getting a little
tiring to have to keep
defending what has been the most
participatory and open global conversation and development of policy priorities that we have ever had.
Some of the criticisms have come from those who didn't get what they wanted in the Sustainable Development Goals
and targets others because
they haven't participated in the process and now realize it is too late and others
because they don't seem to recognize the huge challenges that we fact in the world in the
coming years.
Of course it would be easier if we didn't have to cover so many
issues but we had that chance that was the 1990's. The lack of delivery of
previous commitments means that of course the world now has to face so many
more urgent issues.
I read the story in Humanosphere and of course I wasn't at the meeting so I
can only comment on what was reported as being said. It was a report on the
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundations Global Partners Forum.
"It’s like ‘No targets left behind,’ ” Mark
Suzman, the Gates Foundation’s chief of policy and advocacy. When
following this up with Mark Suzman he
said the comment had been taken out of context and went on to say:
“What I actually said was
that all 169 targets and 17 goals were important and legitimate derived from a
globally inclusive process that we supported, but that as advocates clearly it
is impossible to push equally for all targets and that at the Gates
Foundation we would follow our mandate and mission and focus on what nearly
every member state has said is a shared priority: The unfinished agenda of the
MDGS.”
This
is perhaps yet another example of bad journalism. I don’t expect this to be the
last time I write this between now and the September Summit. I wonder if we
need a ‘war room’ from stakeholders to deal with the misinformation that the
media may be making.
To share the key points that he said which I think would put the
17 Sustainable Development Goals and 169 targets into perspective. The G20 as
was reported by Deputy Prime Minister Ali Babacan said Turkey - G20 chair
for 2015 the Brisbane Action Plan, entails about 1,000 commitments,
"The OECD assesses the draft growth strategies to include
close to 1000 individual structural policy commitments, of which more than 800 are new. This
represents a large increase from earlier G-20 action plans. The clarity and
concreteness of measures has increased, although some measures remain that are
insufficiently precise to allow for robust quantification of their
impact." (OECD Quantifying the Impact of G-20 Members’ Growth
Strategies)
There was also a statement by the Heads of the African Development
Bank, the Asian Development Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and
Development, the European Investment Bank,
the Inter-American Development Bank, the World Bank Group and the
International Monetary Fund:
"2015 marks a critical year for development, as the
international community works towards agreeing on a set of Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs) to meet the dual challenges of overcoming poverty and
protecting the planet. With
their welcome emphasis on issues such as the environment, employment,
infrastructure, and inequality, the SDGs send a clear message to policy-makers
and development practitioners. As leading sources of policy advice and
financing for developing countries, international financial institutions (IFIs)
fully support this comprehensive approach. However, the resources needed to
implement such an ambitious agenda far surpass current development financial
flows.
Achieving the SDGs will require
moving from billions to trillions in resource flows. Such a paradigm shift
calls for a wide-ranging financing framework capable of channeling resources
and investments of all kinds—public and private, national and global."
Attending the Gates Foundation meeting Amina Mohamed quite rightly
said: "The MDGs addressed symptoms, not root causes.
The SDGs are complex and politically unpalatable to many, she
added, precisely because they
seek to fix some of the more difficult, politically charged causes of poverty and inequity."
The Gates
Foundation is also supporting the Global Citizens Campaign
around the SDGs which will be running a large campaign in favor of the SDGs as
- It is not about developing countries it is about EVERY country
- Unlike the MDGs which were dropped in at the last moment this process has gone through a 4 year global consultations starting in July 2011 which has included Rio+20, 120 National Consultations, 11 thematic consultations, a SG Panel chaired by three sitting PMs or Presidents including the UK and 13 SDG Open Working Group Meetings
- The reason it is covering so many issues is in part due to the lack of implementation of previous agreements over the last twenty years
- The agreement has a delicate balance in it for key issues on governance and SRHRs which would be lost if it was reopened
- The push for wanting less was rejected by the UK parliament Environment Audit Committee in December after taking evidence from a wide range of stakeholders and government Ministries – who ever wrote the article should read that report.
- The very few countries that are pushing for less goals are ones that do not want the sustainable buit of the SDGs because they don’t want to be held accountable for sustainable consumption and production issues and inequality issues and I could go on – this is the UK Canada, Australia and USA – so be careful what you are asking for.
Lets focus on starting to put the partnerships together that can deliver the SDGs. This will require consider support from all of us and the leadership that the Gates Foundation has played in health is something that will be needed for the SDGs as well.
We would all wish for those easier times but let us be reminded of the words of Martin Luther King:
"Over the bleached bones of numerous civilizations are written the pathetic words - too late."
Comments
Post a Comment