In 2015, governments negotiated four major global agreements in less than ten months.
Guest blog: Lenni Montiel: Senior UN Development Leader (Ret.) | Former UN Assistant Secretary-General |UNDP Resident Representative | Governance, Public Policy & Multilateral Diplomacy | Leadership Advisor & Trainer | Chevening Scholar. Lenni writes on LinkedIn about the UN and international development. Originally published here.
In 2015, governments negotiated four major global agreements in less than ten months.Most people remember the adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals.
Yet the SDGs were only one piece of a much larger architectural shift.
Look at the timeline of that single year:
๐ In March: the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction.
๐ In July: the Addis Ababa Action Agenda on Financing for Development.
๐ In September: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, with its 17 Goals and 169 targets.
๐ In December: the Paris Agreement on climate change.
Taken together, these agreements reflected how profoundly development thinking had evolved over fifty years.
The earlier UN Development Decades had already demonstrated that economic growth alone was not enough.
๐ The 1970s brought necessary attention to basic needs, inequality, the international economic order and environmental limits.
๐ The 1980s exposed the severe social consequences of debt and structural adjustment.
๐ The 1990s expanded development toward human development, human rights, governance and environmental sustainability.
๐ The Millennium Development Goals then demonstrated the power of concentrating political attention around a limited set of measurable targets.
By 2015, the central challenge had changed.
How could all these dimensions be connected into a coherent whole?
The 2030 Agenda provided an ambitious response.
First, development became explicitly universal.
The goals were designed for every country, North and South, not only developing nations.
Second, the substantive scope expanded dramatically.
Poverty and hunger remained central. But so did inequality, decent work, industrialization, infrastructure, sustainable cities, institutions, oceans and climate action.
Third, the goals were defined as integrated and indivisible.
Poverty could not be treated separately from education and health.
Economic growth could not be separated from employment and inequality.
Development could not be separated from climate and environmental protection.
And progress could not be considered successful if vulnerable groups populations remained excluded.
Hence the defining principle:
Leave no one behind.
Crucially, the wider 2015 architecture recognized that setting goals alone was insufficient:
• Addis Ababa addressed the complex question of how development would be financed.
• Sendai acknowledged that disasters and vulnerability could wipe out years of development progress.
• Paris reinforced that climate action and development could no longer be treated as separate agendas.
2015 was not simply the moment when 8 MDGs became 17 SDGs.
It was an attempt to connect development, financing, disaster resilience and climate within a broader global architecture.
After more than half a century of expanding development agendas, the ambition was extraordinary, but reservations existed about implementation.
Yet the SDGs were only one piece of a much larger architectural shift.
Look at the timeline of that single year:
๐ In March: the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction.
๐ In July: the Addis Ababa Action Agenda on Financing for Development.
๐ In September: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, with its 17 Goals and 169 targets.
๐ In December: the Paris Agreement on climate change.
Taken together, these agreements reflected how profoundly development thinking had evolved over fifty years.
The earlier UN Development Decades had already demonstrated that economic growth alone was not enough.
๐ The 1970s brought necessary attention to basic needs, inequality, the international economic order and environmental limits.
๐ The 1980s exposed the severe social consequences of debt and structural adjustment.
๐ The 1990s expanded development toward human development, human rights, governance and environmental sustainability.
๐ The Millennium Development Goals then demonstrated the power of concentrating political attention around a limited set of measurable targets.
By 2015, the central challenge had changed.
How could all these dimensions be connected into a coherent whole?
The 2030 Agenda provided an ambitious response.
First, development became explicitly universal.
The goals were designed for every country, North and South, not only developing nations.
Second, the substantive scope expanded dramatically.
Poverty and hunger remained central. But so did inequality, decent work, industrialization, infrastructure, sustainable cities, institutions, oceans and climate action.
Third, the goals were defined as integrated and indivisible.
Poverty could not be treated separately from education and health.
Economic growth could not be separated from employment and inequality.
Development could not be separated from climate and environmental protection.
And progress could not be considered successful if vulnerable groups populations remained excluded.
Hence the defining principle:
Leave no one behind.
Crucially, the wider 2015 architecture recognized that setting goals alone was insufficient:
• Addis Ababa addressed the complex question of how development would be financed.
• Sendai acknowledged that disasters and vulnerability could wipe out years of development progress.
• Paris reinforced that climate action and development could no longer be treated as separate agendas.
2015 was not simply the moment when 8 MDGs became 17 SDGs.
It was an attempt to connect development, financing, disaster resilience and climate within a broader global architecture.
After more than half a century of expanding development agendas, the ambition was extraordinary, but reservations existed about implementation.
Comments
Post a Comment