Guest Blog from UNEA Progress on Plastics Update Issue 4 (29 May 2018)
PLASTICS AT UNEA Newsletter
The following tet is part of the Plastics Update Issue 4 from the negotiations in Nairobi.
The United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA) and several global environmental agreements have taken an interest in plastic pollution, recognising it as a serious and rapidly growing issue of global concern which requires an urgent and global response. Following the UNEA3 meeting in December 2017, UN Environment formed an Ad Hoc Open Ended Expert Group (AHOEEG) to present options to combat marine plastic litter and microplastics for global consideration of member states, experts, and civil society.Several representatives of the #BreakFreeFromPlastic movement are in attendance for the first of two AHOEEG meetings in support of a joint call for an international legally binding agreement on plastics and plastic pollution. Referred to as “Option 3” in the content analyzed in this meeting, this position, endorsed by 6 of the 9 Major Groups and co-signed by many NGOs worldwide, calls for any such convention to include certain features including a binding global reduction target, caps on production and consumption of plastics, and requirements for loss prevention, collection, and recycling of all plastics.
Issue 1: UNEA3 Progress on Plastics (30 Nov 2017)
Issue 2: UNEA3 Progress on Plastics (4 Dec 2017)
Issue 3: UNEA3 Progress on Plastics (6 Dec 2017)Background on AHOEEG
Since December, a number of background papers have been prepared to establish the scope of the AHOEEG and to inform its ongoing work. The first of the two AHOEEG meetings is being held this week in Nairobi. The second will be held in November - the dates and location to be finalized during this first meeting.
The AHOEEG has been tasked with a technical expert examination of:
- Barriers to combating marine litter and microplastics;
- Various national, regional, and international response options for taking action;
- Cost and benefits of those response options;
- Feasibility and effectiveness of those response options.
In the preparatory documents, the UNEP Secretariat has succinctly defined the three main response options to be considered by this group as:
Option 1: Maintain status quo
Option 2: Revise and strengthen existing frameworks, adding components to address industry
Option 3: New global architecture with multi-layered governance approach (which will also include the implementation of Option 2 as the architecture is negotiated)
The #BreakFreeFromPlastic coordination group, in advance of the AHOEEG, have sought to work with partners and member states to reinforce that Option 1,
“Maintaining the status quo,” is not a viable option as it will not solve the plastic pollution crisis. These BFFP member groups have joined with 6 of the 9 Major Groups to endorse the pursuit of Option 3, calling for a set of strong enforcement mechanisms to ensure governments and industries comply with global targets for reduction and production and consumption.
In the full issue which you can get online here are::
- Background on Ad Hoc Open Ended Expert Group (AHOEEG)
- Major Groups and Stakeholders Forum:
- Dialogue with Member States
- Outcomes Statement
- World Environment Day - 5 June
- Why Are Plastics a Problem?
Editor & Contact: Jane Patton, No Waste Louisiana (email@example.com)
Post a Comment