Guest Blog: Sustainable Development Is Critical for Climate Action
Khalil Shahyd’s work
focuses on the Energy Efficiency for All Project, which aims to increase
utility-funded energy efficiency programs in the affordable multifamily housing
sector. He coordinates with NRDC’s affordable housing partners to advocate for
efficiency investments in the EPA’s Clean Power Plan. As part of the LEED
Neighborhood Development initiative, Shahyd also promotes the expansion of
“green” communities in New Orleans.
Climate activists are
often frustrated by the slow pace of national and global actions on climate
change. Recognizing the urgent need for action doesn’t always give rise to the
political will necessary to follow through, particularly with an
issue as complex as transitioning the global economy away from fossil fuels.
A recent paper in Science Magazine titled "A
roadmap for rapid de-carbonization" (hereafter “the roadmap”) spells
that part out—as does a perhaps more accessible Vox article reviewing it, and both explain in clear
detail the scale of the daunting task ahead of us. However, the truth is that
too often, discussion of actions required to address climate change neglect the
broader dimensions of sustainable development that will be required to meet the
U.N.’s ambitious and necessary targets on carbon emissions.
Patricia
Espinosa, head of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change (UNFCCC) recently reminded that “the ultimate objectives of the Paris
Climate Change Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) will be
achieved only if they are fully recognized as one encompassing agenda.”
A cynical approach to
the U.N. Sustainable
Development Goals would be to simply assume they are a random
accumulation of aspirations that most rational people would support. They
favor, for example, logical steps like ending poverty and hunger, improving
health and education, making cities more sustainable, combating climate change,
and protecting oceans and forests but are less clear on how they all interact
and complement one another.
The roadmap for
success breaks the actions necessary to reduce carbon emissions and avoid the 2
degrees Celsius threshold into three 10-year time intervals each representing
stages of development in achieving a post-carbon reality. The SDGs can
complement these scenarios by ensuring that above all else, action on
climate change “leaves no one
behind.”
To accomplish that
complex and challenging higher purpose, the 17 SDG goals were carefully
considered and negotiated and contain numerous linkages to each other and to
climate action more broadly.
2017-2020: Establishing
the Policy Framework
The authors of the
de-carbonization roadmap describe a period from 2017-2020 to set the policies
to ensure that the reductions in carbon emissions begin by the end of the
period. In addition, they suggest that “all cities and major corporations in
the industrialized world should have de-carbonization strategies in
place.”
Getting the right
policies in place across nations and hundreds of cities, of diverse sizes,
histories and economic character will require an extraordinary amount of
“political will” to achieve it and the engagement of people and actors across
many nations, cities and sectors. More importantly, how and who decides this
policy mix will determine the patterns of development, the pace, space and
structure of our decarbonized future. It is a critical step in the work that
should be inclusive of multiple voices and perspectives.
Goal 17 of the
SDGs—on strengthening partnerships—includes key elements of a strategy to build
the political will and capacity of cities and nations to respond to the
challenging scenario set forth in the de-carbonization roadmap. Achieving these
ambitious targets will require a revitalized and enhanced global partnership
bringing together governments, civil society, the private sector, the United
Nations system and other actors to mobilize all available resources. This
means the task will only be successful with strong relationships—no minor
point.
2020-2030:
Time to Show and Prove
The period between
2020-2030 is the core implementation phase of the de-carbonization strategy
(and simultaneously the final 10-year stretch of the 2030 Agenda on the SDGs).
Within this period, the roadmap suggest that coal will be about to exit the
global energy scene, and carbon pricing should be expanded to cover all
greenhouse gas emissions with a minimum price of $50 per metric ton. The
authors of note that improving energy efficiency alone could reduce emissions
“40 to 50% by around 2030.” Finally a massive new investment in transportation
technology, light rail and electrification, along with greater efficiencies in
industrial production will round out to core advancements necessary to reduce
emissions.
First, eliminating
coal from the global energy supply implies a massive shift in energy assets and
most importantly labor. SDG Goal 8 helps ensure
that the transition from coal does not abandon workers and the communities that
rely on revenue from those industries for economic growth.
Second improving
energy efficiency is a worthy goal. However, unless attention is paid to the distribution of
efficiency services, many low-income families, communities and the
institutions that serve them will remain isolated and unserved. The SDGs
provide a useful frame to target resources to this fact with Goal 7, ensuring “access
to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all” that includes
the target to increase investment in energy efficiency as a percentage of GDP.
Further, the authors
identified the need for greater efficiency in industrial production, and the
SDGs, too, make a priority of this issue with Goal 12 on
sustainable consumption and production patterns. Attaining and sustaining human
quality of life requires certain levels of economic growth and development.
Ensuring that we meet the physical needs of people without endangering the
planet is at the root of this discussion and often most difficult challenge in
the transition.
2030-2040: On the Path to
Sustainability
During this 10-year
period, the policies, institutions and processes driving our transition to a
more sustainable society are becoming more mature, including carbon-neutral or
carbon-negative building construction.
Internal combustion
engines for short distance hauling and personal transit along with fossil
driven aircraft will be almost non-existent and oil will be in rapid decline as
a the primary fuel in the global energy mix.
This phase is critical
for ensuring that the policies established in the initial period and the
implementation strategies deployed in the first 10-year increment distribute
the benefits and burdens of this transition equitably.
The SDGs offer many
goals that can help to focus our efforts in a way to meet multiple objectives.
More importantly, we must address the implication of these changes and how they
impact the ability of people to choose how and where to live. SDG Goals 1–poverty; 5–gender equity; and 10–reducing inequality respectively
provide important frameworks to measuring policy outcomes. For example, how
does carbon-neutral or carbon-negative building construction impact the cost of
housing for families, particularly in many cities were housing
affordability is already at crisis points?
Similarly, shifting
from gas-fueled cars to electric vehicles and alternative transit options will
have clear impacts on the spatial organization and social structure of cities,
including issues of mobility and access. SDG Goal 11, on making cities
and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable, is a key
strategic framework for addressing these specific challenges, as is Goal 9 on inclusive
industrialization and a more resilient infrastructure.
Also, some goals of
the 2030 sustainability agenda will benefit from improved environmental quality
and reduced carbon emissions. However these same goals can provide important
incentives and motivations for continuing progress toward the climate agenda.
One such goal is SDG Goal 3 on health and
wellbeing. The relationship between climate change and health outcomes is
now well understood. Health is often framed as a “co-benefit” to climate action
where carbon emissions are the primary target or goal. However in as many
cases, climate action and financing can benefit from the priorities of
messaging health and wellbeing outcomes as the core priority. Rather than just
a co-benefit, investments in health that take climate change impacts into
consideration can create complementary relationships between targets on
improving health and wellbeing as provided by the SDGs and building public
support for climate action.
Additional issues will
also have to be fleshed out—such as creating a more sustainable food production
system, SDG Goal 2 (Zero
Hunger). More than 10 percent of carbon emissions is attributable to the global
food industry and a more sustainable food system also goes back to
supporting improved health and wellbeing.
Improving the capacity
of degraded land and forest cover, SDG Goal 15 (Life on
Land); and oceans, seas and larger water bodies, SDG Goal 14 (Life Below
Water), to improve ability of these critical ecosystems to act as natural
carbon sinks will also prove key to meeting climate targets, according to the
roadmap. However, the authors warn that we must be careful in addressing these
issues by ensuring to “resolve deployment issues relating to food security,
biodiversity preservation, indigenous rights, and societal acceptance.”
2040-2050:
Monitor, Evaluate, and Renew
In this final stage of
the roadmap, nations are well on their way toward meeting climate goals and are
evaluating those processes, with any needed reassessments developed and
incorporated immediately.
This is also where the
work comes full circle. Just as we began this discussion with SDG Goal 17; we
come back to the development of partnerships and inclusive processes to engage
the public and civil society in assessments of outcomes, addressing challenges
and charting new courses. However, we must not take for granted that
various sectors of the public and civil society will have the capacity and
interest to participate in these necessary conversations. To ensure that the
trust in public institutions exists and that engagement is truly inclusive, SDG Goal 16 on peace,
justice and strong institutions is vital to overcoming the conflict and the
instability with which many communities now struggle.
Finally, a society
that lacks a strong education system will struggle to galvanize the human
resources necessary to make difficult decisions and execute them successfully.
SDG Goal 4 (Quality
Education) serves as a reminder of the central role of education in creating
inclusive societies capable of innovation and accountability to the public.
All Together Now
Action on climate
change and sustainable development must be considered in tandem.
Climate Change and
increased risk of extreme weather resulting in natural disasters have the
potential to undermine progress on poverty alleviation, weaken the stability of
communities and increase inequality. Similarly, unsustainable development can
slow, or threaten progress on climate change, by potentially increasing
consumption of fossil fuels as consumers become more wealthy, homes become
larger and people rely more on private cars than public transit.
In a previous post I
warned against a tendency by many, particularly in the environmental community,
to focus on the Paris Climate Agreement while neglecting implementation of the
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
As the roadmap shows,
a global climate solution goes well beyond a mathematical formula for the least
costly method of reducing carbon emissions. It requires a global development
agenda—one in which all nations are equal participants and engaged.
The SDGs are exactly
that, a global development agenda negotiated by the people and nations of the
world. The SDGs are comprised of 17 goals further broken out into 169
individual targets that can be further refined and localized to ensure meaningful
representation on the ground.
No roadmap can be
absolutely precise in its description of such a complex issue at the scale
necessary to address climate change. This makes it all the more important that
as many people as possible are allowed to engage in thinking through the
appropriate strategies.
Sustainable
development is not a fortunate byproduct of climate action; it is its
organizing principle. As we continue to advance and confront the coming executive actions looming over continued climate action,
the integration of the Sustainable Development Goals and actions to address
Climate Change provide a blueprint for how we move forward.
Comments
Post a Comment