Skip to main content

Guest blog: Ecocide: The need for a new international law to criminalise the destruction of the environment.

Harry Wright is a lawyer, Deputy Co-Chair of the United Nations Association Westminster Young Professionals and co-founder of the environmental initiative The Conservation Project. Harry is also a passionate conservationist and humanitarian. 

In 2015, our planet witnessed one of the worst environmental crimes in history, the burning and incineration of the Indonesian rainforest perpetrated allegedly by palm oil companies. It led to the desecration of millions of acres of pristine tropical forest, over 500,000 people (including children) becoming hospitalised with respiratory problems, the premature deaths of over 100,000 people and the incineration of hundreds of critically endangered orangutans. [1] It was perhaps an Ecocide, or a genocide of an entire ecosystem.
Today, the criminal destruction to our natural world continues and although companies and individuals can be held responsible for a variety of environmental harms, many incidents do not result in compensation or prosecution and few individuals are ever threatened with criminal sanctions or sentences. The law of Ecocide seeks to change this and make the extensive destruction of ecosystems illegal internationally. Instead of a hapless fine, CEO’s and Heads of States will be held personal criminally responsible for decisions which result in substantial environmental damage.

To make Ecocide an international crime, environmental barrister Polly Higgins submitted a proposal to the International Law Commission in 2010. The proposal sought to amend the Rome Statue (which formed the International Criminal Court in 1998) and include Ecocide as the 5th International Crime Against Peace. The Rome Statue is one of the most powerful legal documents in the whole world assigning the most serious crimes to the international community over and above all other laws. Crimes that already exist within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court under Article 5 of the Rome Statute, are known collectively as a Crime Against Peace. They include:
"Article 5(1)
1. The Crime of Genocide
2. Crimes Against Humanity
3. War Crimes
4. The Crime of Aggression
To be added:
5. The Crime of Ecocide." [2]

By creating an international law of Ecocide, you are on one hand criminalising mass damage and destruction and on the other creating a legal duty to give assistance to ensure no significant harm occurs for future generations. The duty of care element applies to “prevent, prohibit and pre-empt both human-caused Ecocide and natural catastrophes. In the event of an ecological catastrophe (e.g. rising sea levels - naturally occurring ecocide, mass deforestation - human caused ecocide) or a cultural devastation (loss of a community’s way of life - cultural ecocide), not only do the state parties have a duty to prosecute but also a duty to give assistance. Where a state is either unwilling or unable to do so, individuals can seek remedy through the International Criminal Court (ICC) or a similar body." [3]
Since 2010, the principle has started to gain some momentum and last year an appellate court in Guatemala upheld an unprecedented charge of Ecocide against a Spanish African palm oil corporation for polluting an entire riverway and killing all the life therein [4]. The ICC has also this year widened its remit to include environmental destruction cases (such as land grabbing) under existing crimes [5]. However, with the tragic loss of ecosystems and biodiversity at an unprecedented rate, there is still much work to be done.  

Making Ecocide an international crime would mark a significant step in securing the protection of vital ecosystems around the world.  It would send a strong message to those who continue to put profit first and fail to even look at (never-mind address) the consequences of their actions. In a world where our current economic system is predicated on short term thinking and greed, the law of Ecocide will look to flip this, so in the future a decision to destroy an ecosystem for profit will become an exception rather than the normative we see today.

As we continue to lose vast amounts of our home, the urgency to implement this law has never been greater. All we need now is the political will and determination to make it happen. It could be said, that one day, not far from now, the earth may finally have access to justice.



  1. Great Information Harry. Ya. Ecocide an international crime only the feasible way in securing the protection of vital ecosystems. Your detailed post helps me lot. Thanks again.! Criminal Lawyers in Dubai

  2. Hi Dear,
    I See Your Blog Daily.
    Your Blog Is Very Useful For Me
    And I Like So Much..


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Guest Blog Mike Barry: 5 things we learnt on Marks and Spencer Plan A journey over last 12 months

Guest Blog by Mike Barry:  Director of Sustainable Business (Plan A) at Marks and Spencer

It’s that time of year, publication of our annual sustainability (Plan A) report. After the harum scarum dash to gather, collate, assure, sign-off and publish a wealth of data we can breathe (for a moment!) and reflect on what it all means.
Here are some quick insights into what we’ve learnt at M&S in the last 12 months on our Plan A journey.
1. Succession – Nine years is a long time in the world of sustainable business. How many corporate plans have come and gone since we launched Plan A in 2007? Too many! The continuity offered by having a single multi-year plan has been incredibly important. It’s allowed us to take long term decisions in a very short term turbulent retail marketplace. It’s allowed us to build the skills and capabilities in our business units to integrate Plan A into their ways of working. It’s allowed us to pick our battles, knowing that occasionally we’ve just got to let a …

Bokova out? Georgieva in for next UN Secretary General

The rumors that have been circulating for the last month have now proven to be true. The Bulgarian government has withdrawn support from Irina Bokova as their candidate for UN Secretary General and replaced her with Kristalina Georgieva, the European commissioner for budget and human resources.
There is some evidence that the right of center parties in European capitals have been behind this with some articles appearing in the last few weeks against Bokova. The Guardian reported on the 26th: “one of her (Kristalina’s) staff members was hacked and emails purporting to be from one of her top aides were sent out to the rest of her office, instructing them to attack Bokova”There is no question that Kristalina has the cv and record to be a very good UN Secretary General. She is a strong supporter of sustainable development issues she will pick up the SDGs and climate agendas with ease. She is dynamic and very personable and was very active around last week’s UN General Assembly High Level se…

Rest in Peace Tania Valerie Raguz 'one of our own'

Photo by IISD/ENB 
It is with deep sadness that I heard of the passing of Tania Valerie Raguz.

Many of us will have worked with her at United Nations meetings over the past ten years when she was the First Secretary of the Mission of Croatia to the UN.

Tania Valerie Raguz was on the Bureau for Rio+20 and a Vice-Chair Of the Bureau of the seventeenth session of the Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) and  most recently she had joined the world of NGOs working as the Public Affairs Advisor for the World Animal Protection previously know as World Society for the Protection of Animals. WAP had been very active around Rio+20 and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and she helped their work particularly around the SDGs.

Tania played her role in helping to frame the agenda that we are all committed to delivering on. CSD17 was one of the more successful CSD and without Rio+20 there would be no Sustainable Development Goals.

Photo by IISD/ENB I will miss her positive energy, laught…