Skip to main content

Guest Blog by Katherine Teh-White : Driving sustainable development innovation


Katherine Teh-White @ktehwhite
 "Sustainable innovation that hasn't earned societal trust by the time it's available will be meaningless in this consumer era. We need sustainable innovation that has a social licence."

We now know that our consumption of resources is exceeding planetary limits with devastating consequences. Only collective, radical action from civil society, governments and corporations will achieve the sustainable development we so urgently need. The Sustainable Development Goals, ratified by 193 countries in September 2015, offer us both a vision and a practical roadmap for how to get there.
But achieving these goals will require deep disruption to our current business models. The widening gap between the level of responsibility for sustainable development that society expects from corporations and their actual performance makes a business-as-usual approach an increasingly risky option. Inaction now runs counter to the interests of all parties. Without sustainable transformation, we risk a whole range of worst-case scenarios: not just failing businesses, but real humanitarian, environmental and economic catastrophe.

As billions of people are forced to share ever-dwindling resources, there is perhaps no more important question than how we can hydrate, feed, clothe, house, educate and employ our growing global population while avoiding conflict. And answers are no longer expected from governments alone. Increasingly, corporations are being expected to step in and step up.

The Futureye Curve, a tool we use to map the extent and nature of society’s engagement with a given topic, has been used to track the rising societal expectations around corporate responsibility for sustainable development for more than a decade. In our new report, The Age of the Curve Hugger, we set out the need for organisations and industries to understand the maturity of the sustainable development agenda and their own performance in relation to the Curve. Those that do - Curve Huggers, as we call them – understand the true risks of falling behind society’s expectations and can learn to innovate at the requisite rate of change, reaping far-reaching benefits and positive flow-on effects.
Such integrated sustainable development innovation requires radical new models of collaboration that reach far beyond a corporation’s internal strategy to encompass entire supply chains. The Global Compact represents the perfect platform to facilitate and support such partnerships. We cannot go it alone. If we’re to have any hope of achieving our common goals, businesses will need to collaborate with each other – reaching deep into their supply chains – as well as with civil society and government. And they will need to plug into overarching sustainability frameworks, such as the Sustainable Development Goals, rather than rely on the self-selected indicators of traditional CSR metrics.

The barriers to sustainable development innovation, set out in our report, are both significant and substantive, but they are by no means insurmountable. Already, a new generation of sustainable innovators is beginning to disrupt established modes of business, driving corporate and investor success while delivering societal value. At Futureye, we work with corporations to transform their internal culture, systems, structures, roles and responsibilities in such a way that they can begin to generate new, or adapted product lines and ways of doing business that align with global conditions and expectations.

I firmly believe that the next decade will bring an explosion of sustainable innovators: a generation of innovation that will see sustainable ethics driving the business models, products and inclusive green economies of the future.

Katherine Teh-White is founder and Managing Director of Futureye. Katherine specialises in corporate strategy for organisations facing fast-changing socio-political expectations, and has worked on complex issues with significant conflict to create win-win-win solutions for corporations, community and government. Katherine has extensive experience in building corporate reputations and shareholder value through corporate social responsibility, corporate governance, accountability and transparency. She has recently trained company directors on governing sustainability, taught concepts about outrage, created transformation champions and helped made organisations more proactive through dealing with cultural values and systems. She is a political scientist and strategist who works with community psychologists, sociologists, anthropologists, organizational designers, engineers, lawyers, community development specialists, activists, journalists, risk communicators, public relations and marketing managers.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Guest Blog Mike Barry: 5 things we learnt on Marks and Spencer Plan A journey over last 12 months

Guest Blog by Mike Barry:  Director of Sustainable Business (Plan A) at Marks and Spencer

It’s that time of year, publication of our annual sustainability (Plan A) report. After the harum scarum dash to gather, collate, assure, sign-off and publish a wealth of data we can breathe (for a moment!) and reflect on what it all means.
Here are some quick insights into what we’ve learnt at M&S in the last 12 months on our Plan A journey.
1. Succession – Nine years is a long time in the world of sustainable business. How many corporate plans have come and gone since we launched Plan A in 2007? Too many! The continuity offered by having a single multi-year plan has been incredibly important. It’s allowed us to take long term decisions in a very short term turbulent retail marketplace. It’s allowed us to build the skills and capabilities in our business units to integrate Plan A into their ways of working. It’s allowed us to pick our battles, knowing that occasionally we’ve just got to let a …

Bokova out? Georgieva in for next UN Secretary General

The rumors that have been circulating for the last month have now proven to be true. The Bulgarian government has withdrawn support from Irina Bokova as their candidate for UN Secretary General and replaced her with Kristalina Georgieva, the European commissioner for budget and human resources.
There is some evidence that the right of center parties in European capitals have been behind this with some articles appearing in the last few weeks against Bokova. The Guardian reported on the 26th: “one of her (Kristalina’s) staff members was hacked and emails purporting to be from one of her top aides were sent out to the rest of her office, instructing them to attack Bokova”There is no question that Kristalina has the cv and record to be a very good UN Secretary General. She is a strong supporter of sustainable development issues she will pick up the SDGs and climate agendas with ease. She is dynamic and very personable and was very active around last week’s UN General Assembly High Level se…

Rest in Peace Tania Valerie Raguz 'one of our own'

Photo by IISD/ENB 
It is with deep sadness that I heard of the passing of Tania Valerie Raguz.

Many of us will have worked with her at United Nations meetings over the past ten years when she was the First Secretary of the Mission of Croatia to the UN.

Tania Valerie Raguz was on the Bureau for Rio+20 and a Vice-Chair Of the Bureau of the seventeenth session of the Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) and  most recently she had joined the world of NGOs working as the Public Affairs Advisor for the World Animal Protection previously know as World Society for the Protection of Animals. WAP had been very active around Rio+20 and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and she helped their work particularly around the SDGs.

Tania played her role in helping to frame the agenda that we are all committed to delivering on. CSD17 was one of the more successful CSD and without Rio+20 there would be no Sustainable Development Goals.

Photo by IISD/ENB I will miss her positive energy, laught…