Skip to main content

What is happening in financing the Global Goals on Sustainable Development

Over the last four years around the SDGs there have been many things that have concerned me most resolved themselves over time...often longer than i had hoped. One of the core concerns I had over the whole time was the issue of financing the implementation of the goals and targets.

I have written of my disappointment - perhaps that is the nicest way to express my feeling on the lost opportunities of  Financing for Development. I did have a talk with DFID in 2013 suggesting that they and other funders needed to ensure that in their 2015 budgeting for 2016 they created flexibility to ensure funds would be available for immediate work on the SDGs.

I was told not to worry about these kinds of things of course the donor community would be doing this. I will be I am sure returning to this issue next year as we see whether this is true.

What I wanted to address in this blog is what is the UN doing to prepare to spend additional funding on the SDGs next year. Lets go back to the recently agreed Transforming Our World Declaration that Heads of State endorsed in September. The important paragraph is 46:

"We underline the important role and comparative advantage of an adequately resourced, relevant, coherent, efficient and effective UN system in supporting the achievement of the SDGs and sustainable development. While stressing the importance of strengthened national ownership and leadership at country level, we express our support for the ongoing ECOSOC Dialogue on the longer-term positioning of the United Nations development system in the context of this Agenda."

So the question is what budget has Committee 5 of the UN General Assembly been looking at as far as what the UN has put forward for 'adequately resourced'.

One would imagine that this would have produced an increased budget for the 'increased' work that will be undertaken at all levels of the UN to play their role in implementing the 'transformational agenda'. This year would be one of the few years that member states would understand that the UN needed additional resources.

So what I do not understand is why the Secretary General did not include to as far as I can see any allocation for the Addis Ababa Action Plan or the 2030 agenda.

I and I am sure I speak for many many people when I say that we support the effort of G77 in their request for revised estimates that include the additional work that will need to be undertaken by the UN on the two agendas.

In addition to the lack of budget for next year for the two agendas it seems that ALL of the money that was allocated for sustainable development for the regional commissions has been cut.

If it turns out that the reason for this is that developed countries do not want an increased budget then I think the time is now to remind those officials that their Heads of State agreed to this agenda with a role for the UN system that needs 'adequate resources'.

If you are from a developed country can i suggest you raise this with your Ambassador, your development Minister and your Head of State.  I would like to see parliaments also take this up in questions to the relevant Ministers. Are they aware of what is happening?

We have about a month to turn this round.

I hope I am wrong on this because it would undermine the work of everybody over the last 4 years to agree this agenda then to find that developed countries were not serious in seeing it implemented.


  1. hey Felix, thanks for raising this issue. Can you share the source or document that tells that all the budgets for SD for the regional commissions is cut ? indeed interesting to know and to protest against.
    greetz, Leida

  2. they are here

  3. Very unfortunate ! But at the same time private funding for SDGs is growing, what will be the accountability mechanisms?


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

New Executive Director of UNEP announced

Erik Solheim according to Norwegian newspapers is to be announced today as the new Executive Director of UNEP. And later today Monday the 2nd of May ABC News confirm too.

He faced stiff competition for the number one job on the environment in the UN system. In the 6 Executive Directors of UNEP it will mean that developed countries will have had 5 of them with two Canadians (Strong and Dowdeswell) and Germany (Toepfer and Steiner). The only Executive Director to come from a developing country was Dr. Mostafa Kamal Tolba who died recently.

Erik brings considerable experience to the position having held been from 2007 to 2012  the combined portfolio of Norway’s Minister of the Environment and International Development; he also served as Minister of International Development from 2005 to 2007. During his time as minister Norwegian aid reached 1%, the highest in the world.

Since January 2013 he has been the Chair of the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC). In the DAC he has emphasi…

Guest Blog Mike Barry: 5 things we learnt on Marks and Spencer Plan A journey over last 12 months

Guest Blog by Mike Barry:  Director of Sustainable Business (Plan A) at Marks and Spencer

It’s that time of year, publication of our annual sustainability (Plan A) report. After the harum scarum dash to gather, collate, assure, sign-off and publish a wealth of data we can breathe (for a moment!) and reflect on what it all means.
Here are some quick insights into what we’ve learnt at M&S in the last 12 months on our Plan A journey.
1. Succession – Nine years is a long time in the world of sustainable business. How many corporate plans have come and gone since we launched Plan A in 2007? Too many! The continuity offered by having a single multi-year plan has been incredibly important. It’s allowed us to take long term decisions in a very short term turbulent retail marketplace. It’s allowed us to build the skills and capabilities in our business units to integrate Plan A into their ways of working. It’s allowed us to pick our battles, knowing that occasionally we’ve just got to let a …

Bokova out? Georgieva in for next UN Secretary General

The rumors that have been circulating for the last month have now proven to be true. The Bulgarian government has withdrawn support from Irina Bokova as their candidate for UN Secretary General and replaced her with Kristalina Georgieva, the European commissioner for budget and human resources.
There is some evidence that the right of center parties in European capitals have been behind this with some articles appearing in the last few weeks against Bokova. The Guardian reported on the 26th: “one of her (Kristalina’s) staff members was hacked and emails purporting to be from one of her top aides were sent out to the rest of her office, instructing them to attack Bokova”There is no question that Kristalina has the cv and record to be a very good UN Secretary General. She is a strong supporter of sustainable development issues she will pick up the SDGs and climate agendas with ease. She is dynamic and very personable and was very active around last week’s UN General Assembly High Level se…