Skip to main content

Bjorn Wrong Again

I had missed Bjorn Lomborg’s article in the Guardian "These are the four SDGs we need to agree on to help the planet" in the section sponsored by Business call to Action. I can only hope that someone else decided on the title as it clearly indicates a lack of understanding what a target and a goal is. This was as I am sure many of my readers would appreciate was because I was recovering from the over two weeks of negotiations on the final text for the Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. I didn’t see Bjorn there at all maybe I missed him.

The article is recycling what he had said this time last year and is so out of date in its criticism of the SDGs you have to wonder if he has understood the process at all. The SDGs and their targets (other than some that underwent some technical fixing e.g. filling in the x’s) were decided last August. He takes a snarky jib at what was the most consultative and transparent process conducted by the UN for any global agreement:

“After a process of haggling and horse-trading, the UN has a working list of 169 targets – a whopping 151 more than the 18 MDGs that I believe changed the world. This is a mistake. Having 169 priorities is like having no priorities at all.”

There was a little haggling and horse-trading for the Declaration in the last few weeks of July but in most cases for the better see my review. In the case of the original SDGs and targets agreed last year the reason that we have 17 goals and 169 targets is because of what I have said a number of times. The MDGs were for developing countries and the SDGs are for ALL countries. The MDGs were just addressing development and the SDGs are addressing SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. The MDGs dealt with the impacts of policies and the SDGs address the root causes.

Bjorn suggests that for targets are the most important and claims because he has asked: “60 teams of top economists, including Nobel laureates Finn Kydland and Thomas Schelling, to evaluate the economic, social and environmental costs and benefits of the proposed targets,” that there answers in some way should be our guide.

I am not going to comment on the four targets because it’s not for self-proclaimed experts to decide these things but for national processes to decide which they want to priorities for themselves. What is critical for a country like Jamaica will be different Denmark will be different from India.

The Future

We have still a lot of the infrastructure for the SDGs to be put in place. This next 8 months the global indicators will be agreed. The next meeting is in Bangkok on October 26-28th of the IAEG-SDG group which will produce its report by December for a March UN Statistical Commission meeting. These will be a set of global indicators probably between 100-300. Each country will in addition produce its own set of indicators and stakeholders will be developing their own citizen data sets, industry their own versions of the indicators for their use in reporting. Bjorn is right some of the targets will be more cost effective in collecting data but that should not be the indicator – for far too long NOT enough money and resources has been put into collective more effective data and that needs to change anyway. Investing in data collection will help make better informed policy decisions in the future.

To help the follow-up and review at the HLPF it will be informed by an annual SDG Progress Report (similar to the MDG Progress report over the last 15 years) to be prepared by the Secretary General in cooperation with the UN System, based on the global indicator framework and data produced by national statistical systems and information collected at the regional level.

Over the next six weeks I expect to see more of these types of articles. What we should be focusing on is not the past debate but the future implementation of this transformational agenda.

Finally lets hope that the very good Danish PGA does not have pressure to undo the implementation of a universal, indivisible, integrated 2030 agenda by bringing Bjorn in!!! It would be a revisionist unleashed!


Popular posts from this blog

Guest Blog Mike Barry: 5 things we learnt on Marks and Spencer Plan A journey over last 12 months

Guest Blog by Mike Barry:  Director of Sustainable Business (Plan A) at Marks and Spencer

It’s that time of year, publication of our annual sustainability (Plan A) report. After the harum scarum dash to gather, collate, assure, sign-off and publish a wealth of data we can breathe (for a moment!) and reflect on what it all means.
Here are some quick insights into what we’ve learnt at M&S in the last 12 months on our Plan A journey.
1. Succession – Nine years is a long time in the world of sustainable business. How many corporate plans have come and gone since we launched Plan A in 2007? Too many! The continuity offered by having a single multi-year plan has been incredibly important. It’s allowed us to take long term decisions in a very short term turbulent retail marketplace. It’s allowed us to build the skills and capabilities in our business units to integrate Plan A into their ways of working. It’s allowed us to pick our battles, knowing that occasionally we’ve just got to let a …

Bokova out? Georgieva in for next UN Secretary General

The rumors that have been circulating for the last month have now proven to be true. The Bulgarian government has withdrawn support from Irina Bokova as their candidate for UN Secretary General and replaced her with Kristalina Georgieva, the European commissioner for budget and human resources.
There is some evidence that the right of center parties in European capitals have been behind this with some articles appearing in the last few weeks against Bokova. The Guardian reported on the 26th: “one of her (Kristalina’s) staff members was hacked and emails purporting to be from one of her top aides were sent out to the rest of her office, instructing them to attack Bokova”There is no question that Kristalina has the cv and record to be a very good UN Secretary General. She is a strong supporter of sustainable development issues she will pick up the SDGs and climate agendas with ease. She is dynamic and very personable and was very active around last week’s UN General Assembly High Level se…

Rest in Peace Tania Valerie Raguz 'one of our own'

Photo by IISD/ENB 
It is with deep sadness that I heard of the passing of Tania Valerie Raguz.

Many of us will have worked with her at United Nations meetings over the past ten years when she was the First Secretary of the Mission of Croatia to the UN.

Tania Valerie Raguz was on the Bureau for Rio+20 and a Vice-Chair Of the Bureau of the seventeenth session of the Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) and  most recently she had joined the world of NGOs working as the Public Affairs Advisor for the World Animal Protection previously know as World Society for the Protection of Animals. WAP had been very active around Rio+20 and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and she helped their work particularly around the SDGs.

Tania played her role in helping to frame the agenda that we are all committed to delivering on. CSD17 was one of the more successful CSD and without Rio+20 there would be no Sustainable Development Goals.

Photo by IISD/ENB I will miss her positive energy, laught…