Skip to main content

Reflections on the Financing for Development Zero Draft: The Accord


Waking up to find a copy of the zero draft for Financing for Development was not as welcome as you might think I had other plans for today but perhaps reading it in bits was better than in one sitting.
I don’t intend to comment on updated sections relating to the traditional Monterrey Consensus - there are a number of organizations that are focusing on that. I will keep as I have in previous blogs to the ‘sustainable development finance side’. After all this conference acknowledges that it is focusing on ‘A global framework for financing sustainable development and mobilizing the means to implement the post 2015 development agenda’ in the proposed Addis Ababa Accord.

The zero draft for those that have not read it is broken into two:
  • The Addis Ababa Accord, and
  • The Addis Ababa Action Agenda

Todays blog will focus on the Accord a following blog will focus on the Action Agenda.

The Accord
As you might imagine it is a short and intended to be a visionary document – only sixteen paragraphs to set the scene for those Heads of State and Government and High Representatives that will gather in July in Addis Ababa.  It recognizes that the ‘current policy, financing and investment patters are not delivering the future we want’. It recognizes that there are enormous unmet financing needs for sustainable development and that estimates show a significant shortfall.  

In 1992 Maurice Strong the Secretary General for the Earth Summit was asked by governments to request figures from the UN system for implementing Agenda 21. The estimate came back at $625 billion a year $125 billion from developed to developing countries. The request should be asked again now. How much will it cost to implement the SDGs per year? Countries should be requested to report on how they are then meeting those targets.  I would like to see an SDG part to all budgets presented to parliaments.

The Accord sees the solution to this being three things: strengthening official finance; unlocking the transformative potential of people and the private sector. In terms of ODA the UK has been the first and only G7 country to reach the 0.7% GNI there is clearly still much to be done within the other G7 countries, the US gives 0.19% GNI. In 2013 ODA rose to its highest level, around $135 billion came from the 28 members of the OECD Development Assistant Committee (DAC) around $135 billion in 2013. In addition to this a further $15.9 billion came from the European Commission and non-DAC countries gave an additional $9.4 billion.  In the area of unlocking the transformational potential of people this is a great idea which we can all support but very difficult to measure. On the private sector it of course vital to access the considerable funds available through the capital markets but this must be done through a robust, transparent and accountable regulatory framework.  The Accord does ‘reaffirm’ ‘the importance of freedom, peace, security, good governance, rule of law, sound economic policies and solid democratic institutions at national and international levels’ – it also talks about recognizing that effective policies, regulatory framework and appropriate incentives at all levels are essential to a shift towards sustainable development. As much of the money being identified will come from the capital markets then it isn’t enough to recognize but fundamental to ‘ensure’ that regulation is in place.

The Accord approaches the issue of the global partnership for development with exactly the right focus that it is ‘fundamentally’ the responsibility of governments. As it also points out other stakeholders will have roles in helping to ensure this agenda is realized.

The Accord does commit to a ‘new basic social contract to guarantee nationally appropriate minimum levels of social protection and essential public services for all.’ There is a nod towards the idea of global funds similar to the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (the GAVI Alliance), the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) for areas under different goals. This is something I suggested in the paper I did for UNDESA on the ‘Multi-stakeholder partnerships: Making them work for the Post-2015 Development Agenda.’

In the area of investment in rural development and sustainable agriculture it recognizes that agriculture is primarily financed by the ‘private sector’ not sure what small scale food producers would see themselves described like that. It recognizes that increased private sector investment should be in accordance with the Committee on World Food Security’s Principles for Responsible Investment in Agriculture and Food Systems.’  Principles are good but we need are regulatory frameworks to back up the Principles. The next 15 years are going to be enormously challenging as the world seeks to feed an extra billion people with an increasing water shortage in many developed and developing countries to enable them to deal with competing demands a stronger hand of government will be needed and this should be recognized in the Accord.

One of the other challenges of the next 15 years will be the rapid urbanization of the world with 60% of the world’s population living in urban areas by 2030. This will bring great stress on our resources both natural and human.  Investment in infrastructure that supports an inclusive and sustainable industrialization and innovation is recognized in the Accord.

Finally it was  good to see in the Accord the support for ‘implementing environment, social and governance (ESG) reporting frameworks for the private sector to contribute to transparency and accountability’ – something that many of us called for at Rio+20 and which has been supported by two Secretary general Panel Reports.


So these are my comments on the Accord and soon I will follow them up with a look at the sustainability elements of the Action Agenda. 

Comments

  1. Should the G8 be in charge of education, sustainable development and humanitarian services in the Developing world? Lesson is life come via formal and informal education, while formal education by most is valued as a human right it can be also be utilized to train and develop partakers into self-sufficient contributors and participants towards the development of sustainable societies.
    development financing

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sustainable development was coined in 1987 by the Bruntland Commission where they defined it as, 'development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs'. Since then, sustainable development theory has been greatly expanded and these ideas have been utilised around the world. The need for development to become more sustainable is important, as many of the planet's ecosystems are degraded.commercial financing

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Guest Blog Mike Barry: 5 things we learnt on Marks and Spencer Plan A journey over last 12 months

Guest Blog by Mike Barry:  Director of Sustainable Business (Plan A) at Marks and Spencer

It’s that time of year, publication of our annual sustainability (Plan A) report. After the harum scarum dash to gather, collate, assure, sign-off and publish a wealth of data we can breathe (for a moment!) and reflect on what it all means.
Here are some quick insights into what we’ve learnt at M&S in the last 12 months on our Plan A journey.
1. Succession – Nine years is a long time in the world of sustainable business. How many corporate plans have come and gone since we launched Plan A in 2007? Too many! The continuity offered by having a single multi-year plan has been incredibly important. It’s allowed us to take long term decisions in a very short term turbulent retail marketplace. It’s allowed us to build the skills and capabilities in our business units to integrate Plan A into their ways of working. It’s allowed us to pick our battles, knowing that occasionally we’ve just got to let a …

Bokova out? Georgieva in for next UN Secretary General

The rumors that have been circulating for the last month have now proven to be true. The Bulgarian government has withdrawn support from Irina Bokova as their candidate for UN Secretary General and replaced her with Kristalina Georgieva, the European commissioner for budget and human resources.
There is some evidence that the right of center parties in European capitals have been behind this with some articles appearing in the last few weeks against Bokova. The Guardian reported on the 26th: “one of her (Kristalina’s) staff members was hacked and emails purporting to be from one of her top aides were sent out to the rest of her office, instructing them to attack Bokova”There is no question that Kristalina has the cv and record to be a very good UN Secretary General. She is a strong supporter of sustainable development issues she will pick up the SDGs and climate agendas with ease. She is dynamic and very personable and was very active around last week’s UN General Assembly High Level se…

Rest in Peace Tania Valerie Raguz 'one of our own'

Photo by IISD/ENB 
It is with deep sadness that I heard of the passing of Tania Valerie Raguz.

Many of us will have worked with her at United Nations meetings over the past ten years when she was the First Secretary of the Mission of Croatia to the UN.

Tania Valerie Raguz was on the Bureau for Rio+20 and a Vice-Chair Of the Bureau of the seventeenth session of the Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) and  most recently she had joined the world of NGOs working as the Public Affairs Advisor for the World Animal Protection previously know as World Society for the Protection of Animals. WAP had been very active around Rio+20 and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and she helped their work particularly around the SDGs.

Tania played her role in helping to frame the agenda that we are all committed to delivering on. CSD17 was one of the more successful CSD and without Rio+20 there would be no Sustainable Development Goals.

Photo by IISD/ENB I will miss her positive energy, laught…