Skip to main content

Clarkson and Top Gear - time for a change?

Some of the readers of this blog may not know about the BBC TV programme Top Gear and its controversial presenter Jeremy Clarkson. A little googling and you will learn that Top Gear is a car show that has been on BBC TV since the  1977 the present presenters Jeremy Clarkson, Richard Hammond and James May have been presenting it since 2002 and benefited from the internet and the ability to download programmes.  The show brings in $225 million a year for BBC Worldwide and is shown in 170 countries and is one of the top selling programmes they produce.

I have to say I am a fan of the programme and at times the challenges that the presenters are given you would have to think the producers were trying to kill them. There are some great journeys they go on being given a certain amount of money and having to buy a car in a different country and then go from A to B. Celebrities come on the programme and  have to race a car around a race track one of my favorites was the Tom Cruise episode where he did the final corner on two wheels.


This is all great you might be thinking where is he going with this blog. The problem is that Jeremy Clarkson is fun when he focuses on cars and the interplay between him and his co-presenters but over the years he has been at the center of a number of controversies these are some of the worst. In 2011 he had to apologies to Mexico because he had characterized Mexicans as 'lazy'. In 2012 Indian diplomats complained about a programme where he fitted a toilet in the boot of a car and said 'perfect for India because everyone who comes here gets the trots.' In May last year he used a racist term while reciting a nursery rhyme. Last year Ofcome issued a censure because of comments he made about Asian people while filming in Burma.  Last May he was given his last warning and then this week he was suspended for according to Lucy Manning (BBC News Correspondent) for "allegedly hitting a producer.  

Jeremy Clarkson is to some extent a UK version of the Tea Party - he is unapologetic individualistic who  harks back to a British colonial time period that no longer exists. He doesn't really care about people and the environment. The world we live in is a complicated place which is why governments and stakeholders are trying to draft a trans-formative agenda so we have a way of life on this planet that is sustainable. This is only going to be possible if we work together.We do need this year for governments to agree the SDGs, a new financial compact and a climate agreement which will give us the roadmap for the next 15 years.  This is not Britain of the 1950s and the type of selfless that is 'everyone for themselves, survival of the fittest, devil take the hindmost' will not help us through the real challenges we ALL face.

As i write this the BBC have suspended Clarkson while on Change.org over 400,000 people have signed a petition for him to be reinstated. It is my hope that the BBC investigation will find his actions unacceptable. As a role model for young people his actions and his comments are unacceptable. The problem the BBC have is that he is very very popular and if they do sack him the question is who to replace him with. Or is it time to close the show down?


Comments

  1. I think I first watched the show in 2005 or so since a hermit-like friend of mine is a huge fan. Sharing it with him seemed a kindness.

    After a few episodes I was so disappointed by Clarkson's attitude especially that I haven't watched it since. He was just a bully.

    It's an attitude that characterised the presenters' interplay: their deprecation of others got the biggest laughs and their internal rivalry was measured by who insulted the others the most devastatingly. Since then, the BBC has enabled Clarkson to travel all over the world and gather in all sorts of folk to participate in the big joke.

    He says he was bullied as a child and it seems like he is still acting out in response.

    It's like the audience says, "Oh, c'mon! This is my one indulgence in vicarious laddish hooliganism." When that becomes the national/international pastime, you just have to give your head a shake!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Guest Blog Mike Barry: 5 things we learnt on Marks and Spencer Plan A journey over last 12 months

Guest Blog by Mike Barry:  Director of Sustainable Business (Plan A) at Marks and Spencer

It’s that time of year, publication of our annual sustainability (Plan A) report. After the harum scarum dash to gather, collate, assure, sign-off and publish a wealth of data we can breathe (for a moment!) and reflect on what it all means.
Here are some quick insights into what we’ve learnt at M&S in the last 12 months on our Plan A journey.
1. Succession – Nine years is a long time in the world of sustainable business. How many corporate plans have come and gone since we launched Plan A in 2007? Too many! The continuity offered by having a single multi-year plan has been incredibly important. It’s allowed us to take long term decisions in a very short term turbulent retail marketplace. It’s allowed us to build the skills and capabilities in our business units to integrate Plan A into their ways of working. It’s allowed us to pick our battles, knowing that occasionally we’ve just got to let a …

Bokova out? Georgieva in for next UN Secretary General

The rumors that have been circulating for the last month have now proven to be true. The Bulgarian government has withdrawn support from Irina Bokova as their candidate for UN Secretary General and replaced her with Kristalina Georgieva, the European commissioner for budget and human resources.
There is some evidence that the right of center parties in European capitals have been behind this with some articles appearing in the last few weeks against Bokova. The Guardian reported on the 26th: “one of her (Kristalina’s) staff members was hacked and emails purporting to be from one of her top aides were sent out to the rest of her office, instructing them to attack Bokova”There is no question that Kristalina has the cv and record to be a very good UN Secretary General. She is a strong supporter of sustainable development issues she will pick up the SDGs and climate agendas with ease. She is dynamic and very personable and was very active around last week’s UN General Assembly High Level se…

Rest in Peace Tania Valerie Raguz 'one of our own'

Photo by IISD/ENB 
It is with deep sadness that I heard of the passing of Tania Valerie Raguz.

Many of us will have worked with her at United Nations meetings over the past ten years when she was the First Secretary of the Mission of Croatia to the UN.

Tania Valerie Raguz was on the Bureau for Rio+20 and a Vice-Chair Of the Bureau of the seventeenth session of the Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) and  most recently she had joined the world of NGOs working as the Public Affairs Advisor for the World Animal Protection previously know as World Society for the Protection of Animals. WAP had been very active around Rio+20 and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and she helped their work particularly around the SDGs.

Tania played her role in helping to frame the agenda that we are all committed to delivering on. CSD17 was one of the more successful CSD and without Rio+20 there would be no Sustainable Development Goals.

Photo by IISD/ENB I will miss her positive energy, laught…