Skip to main content

Meta-scan 3 Report: Emerging and Disruptive Technologies and Post 2015

A couple of years ago I reviewed the excellent report by the Canadian Government’s foresight organization’s Meta-scan 2 Report. I am a huge admirer of the work done by the Policy Horizons Canada the foresight organization.

I had missed that they have now brought out their Meta-scan 3 Report. The web site has some excellent videos which: “enable the reader to examine or build their own mental model of these technologies.”

I would make this report a must read for any person engaged in policy development in any area. We are at the edge of huge changes in so many different areas which will impact on employment and our way of life and most people are unaware of what is coming.

What has been a real problem for many people is the rate of change compared to the past and our ability to absorb those changes in our everyday lives. This is only going to increase as we move forward.  

What Meta-scan 3 report does is identify what some of the most likely disruptive technologies are going to be in the next 15 years and the policy challenges ahead.

Meta scan 3 report

The report looks at the potential impact of:
  • Emerging Biotechnologies: synthetic biology, bioinformatics, tissue engineering
  • Emerging Nanotechnologies: Nanomaterials, nanodevices and nanosensors, nanotechnology for energy
  • Emerging Neuroscience Technologies: Naurostimulation, brain-computer interface
  • Emerging Digital Technologies: Artificial intelligence, robotics  

Most of these are not in general public discourse yet but every government  and policy makers should be looking at them and their impacts. Picking up a thread from my review of the Meta-scan 2 report and projects of up to 2 billion job losses over the next 15 years by some people should focus politician’s minds.

So a couple of key areas I want to highlight:

Synthetic Biology: what is possibly the least know and potentially most disruptive of the emerging technologies it basically is developing new biological systems including new foods. It uses:
“genetically engineered organisms to manufacture a growing range of materials such as bioplastics, biofuels, biorubber, biosteel, spider silk and industrial chemicals. Industries that may be disrupted include pulp and paper, building materials, chemical manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, agriculture and fossil fuel extraction.”  (Metascan 3)

Policy challenges: Creating of Genetically Modified Foods (GMOs), automating farms into smart farms with massive loss of jobs:

Bioinformations: The report suggests that ‘do it yourself’ surveillance and weapons systems will become common – the example used in the Switchblade drone which si lethal at short distances and fits into a small backpack. These are going to cause huge problems for the police and military. With open source material and information on all of us now so accessible on the web then the issue of privacy will need redefining. The report says:

“Smart devices will routinely know a person’s movement, and location to within 10 cms, which will make it possible to infer a person’s activity, behavour, interactions and relationships.”
Policy challenges: How to prepare for the spread of cheap but lethal do-it yourself weapons. The reduction of our privacy

3D printing: Over the last two years since I wrote a review of the Meta-scan 2 Report we have seen 3D printers move to the high street, houses being produced by 3D printers and unfortunately guns. The potential for 3D printing many things including veins, hearts in health is huge as is the loss of jobs. Loss of jobs in many industries including building industry and transportation industries with the google car/lorries – driver-less take the products and people from a-b

Policy challenges: How will infrastructure need to change, what rule should govern what you can or cannot print.

The report is rich with suggested impacts and questions for policy makers. What is clear is that the norm for jobs will be mess and many will move to be temporary jobs.  There will be so many more freelance jobs already one of the biggest web sites out and there and growing is Freelance dot com

What Next and Post-2015

  • The overall policy challenges the report ask policy makers to look at are:
  • Temporary jobs become the norm;
  • New patterns of inequality;
  • Infrastructure in Transition
  • Shifting Competitive advantage;
  • Strengthening the Risk Management System;
  • Traditional Notions of IP may no longer be relevant;
  • Exploring New Approaches to Productive and Innovation.


With less people working one of the critical issues will be how the social service is paid for. With a shrinking tax base but an increasing pollution with less jobs it is a recipe for instability unless governments prepare people for the changes coming and the skill base and mindset to be able to change jobs regularly. Some people are even suggesting that the state should provide a minimum wage for people and that jobs post 2030 may be more shared among people.  There huge challenges ahead and so what could the intergovernmental process do to help address these?

I would recommend the UN Secretary General with the UN General Assembly to set up a Commission into New Technologies and their Impacts. This should not be a short time Commission but one which is built on the Brundtland Commission. I would suggest it should be a three year commission with open hearings and its members should include some of the people engaged in the emerging and disruptive technologies.


This is important in the Post-2015 discussion in a number of ways. The first is the discussion on technology facilitation mechanisms. My suggestion is those should be set up for each of the different goals with the relevant UN Agency or Programme acting as a Task Manger for setting up the sector specific technology facilitation mechanism. The second is in areas where they need to have new international and regulation in most of those four areas. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Executive Director of UNEP announced

Erik Solheim according to Norwegian newspapers is to be announced today as the new Executive Director of UNEP. And later today Monday the 2nd of May ABC News confirm too.

He faced stiff competition for the number one job on the environment in the UN system. In the 6 Executive Directors of UNEP it will mean that developed countries will have had 5 of them with two Canadians (Strong and Dowdeswell) and Germany (Toepfer and Steiner). The only Executive Director to come from a developing country was Dr. Mostafa Kamal Tolba who died recently.

Erik brings considerable experience to the position having held been from 2007 to 2012  the combined portfolio of Norway’s Minister of the Environment and International Development; he also served as Minister of International Development from 2005 to 2007. During his time as minister Norwegian aid reached 1%, the highest in the world.

Since January 2013 he has been the Chair of the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC). In the DAC he has emphasi…

Guest Blog Mike Barry: 5 things we learnt on Marks and Spencer Plan A journey over last 12 months

Guest Blog by Mike Barry:  Director of Sustainable Business (Plan A) at Marks and Spencer

It’s that time of year, publication of our annual sustainability (Plan A) report. After the harum scarum dash to gather, collate, assure, sign-off and publish a wealth of data we can breathe (for a moment!) and reflect on what it all means.
Here are some quick insights into what we’ve learnt at M&S in the last 12 months on our Plan A journey.
1. Succession – Nine years is a long time in the world of sustainable business. How many corporate plans have come and gone since we launched Plan A in 2007? Too many! The continuity offered by having a single multi-year plan has been incredibly important. It’s allowed us to take long term decisions in a very short term turbulent retail marketplace. It’s allowed us to build the skills and capabilities in our business units to integrate Plan A into their ways of working. It’s allowed us to pick our battles, knowing that occasionally we’ve just got to let a …

Bokova out? Georgieva in for next UN Secretary General

The rumors that have been circulating for the last month have now proven to be true. The Bulgarian government has withdrawn support from Irina Bokova as their candidate for UN Secretary General and replaced her with Kristalina Georgieva, the European commissioner for budget and human resources.
There is some evidence that the right of center parties in European capitals have been behind this with some articles appearing in the last few weeks against Bokova. The Guardian reported on the 26th: “one of her (Kristalina’s) staff members was hacked and emails purporting to be from one of her top aides were sent out to the rest of her office, instructing them to attack Bokova”There is no question that Kristalina has the cv and record to be a very good UN Secretary General. She is a strong supporter of sustainable development issues she will pick up the SDGs and climate agendas with ease. She is dynamic and very personable and was very active around last week’s UN General Assembly High Level se…