Internet as an engine for growth and sustainable development
From ICT Post
We have seen a move of leadership to understand from more developed countries to leading developing countries in a number of areas but particularly in the runup for Rio+20. We saw Mexico as well as Indonesia, India, Brazil and Colombia taking leadership and I think that that’s a very good sign. On the implementation it’s really interesting because the 1990′s saw significant commitments made by Governments at the Rio Summit, the Copenhagen Summit, the women’s Beijing conference, the Cairo conference, the conference and the other Summit. By 2000 it was clear governments seemed to be unable to implement across such a wide area and were having significant problems in prioritizing resources to the most important areas.
We have seen a move of leadership to understand from more developed countries to leading developing countries in a number of areas but particularly in the runup for Rio+20. We saw Mexico as well as Indonesia, India, Brazil and Colombia taking leadership and I think that that’s a very good sign. On the implementation it’s really interesting because the 1990′s saw significant commitments made by Governments at the Rio Summit, the Copenhagen Summit, the women’s Beijing conference, the Cairo conference, the conference and the other Summit. By 2000 it was clear governments seemed to be unable to implement across such a wide area and were having significant problems in prioritizing resources to the most important areas.
One of the significant results of the
Summit in 2000 was that overseas development assistance started to go up
again, after a period of 10 years from 1992 to 2000 where we saw no
real increase in ODA. The next 10 years saw it double from 60 billion to
around 120 billion a year and this went a long way to accelerate
implementation, a challenge that was underlying 2008 at the UN special
session on MDGs, when the UN Secretary‑General said this about the
development agenda: Looking ahead to 2015 and beyond, he said, there is
no question that we can achieve the overarching goal. We can put an end
to poverty. He also recognized the challenge of the financial crisis. He
went on to say, we face a global economic slowdown and security crisis
both of uncertain magnitude and duration. Global warming has become more
apparent.
These developments will directly affect
our effort to reduce poverty. The economic slowdown will diminish the
incomes of the poor. The food crisis will raise the number of hungry
people in the world and push millions more into poverty, and climate
change will have a disproportionate impact on the poor. The need to
address these concerns, pressing as they are, must not be allowed to
detract from our long‑term effort to achieve the MDGs. We need to keep
the focus on the MDGs as we confront these new challenges.
The idea of the Sustainable Development
Goals was articulated in July 2011 at a Rio+20, a Government sponsored
event on institutional framework for Sustainable Development, held in
Solo, Indonesia, presented by the Director of Economic and Social
Environmental Affairs in the Colombian Government, supported by
Guatemala and other Governments shortly afterwards, such as Peru and
UAE, and that pushed the Sustainable Development Goals coming from
development countries, again showed that transfer of leadership from
developed countries to developing countries.
The original proposal was grounded on
the idea that the MDGs played a significant role in focusing the world
community but that that focus was too narrow and that 7 of the 8 goals
were focused only on developed countries. The only universal goal in the
8 focused on the environment which I mentioned seemed to be very weak
by many of the people in the environment and Sustainable Development
community. The original proposal for the MDG indicated a reinvigoration
of MDG7 by updating the agenda of the Johannesburg plan of the
implementation with up to date Sectorial targets.
In September 2011, NGOs and other
stakeholders met in Bonn at the UN DPI conference and they put on the
table for the first time a set of coherent goals, 17 of them. It’s well
worth looking back to that particular document that came out of that
conference to see the influence that it had in the thinking of
Governments as far as what MDGs should be considered and a runup to
Rio+20 there was much conflict between the environmental and development
community. Development community wanted to continue the MDG approach
and the Sustainable Development community wanted these new goals to be
encompassing both poverty eradication and Sustainable Development.
And that any new goals needed to be
universal and would also address issues such as consumption and
production to enable all of us to live in a more sustainable way on this
planet. That engagement with the preparatory process will be critical
for the process. You need to be engaged now and you need to be engaged
in a very fully in front way. Perhaps I could end with a few words from
Albert Einstein who said: Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for
tomorrow, but the important thing is not to stop questioning.
Comments
Post a Comment