8th letter from the Brazil COP30 Presidency
In further advancing our Global Mutirão against climate change, the Brazilian incoming Presidency of the 30th session of the Conference of the Parties (COP 30) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) presents its eighth letter to the international community, this time dedicated to the vital theme of climate adaptation.
In this letter, I invite Parties and stakeholders to consider adaptation through new lenses: as the next step in human evolution.
As the age of warnings gives way to the age of consequences, humanity confronts a profound truth: climate adaptation is no longer a choice that follows mitigation; it is the first half of our survival. At each turning point in our evolution, our species has earned its place on this planet by adapting – learning, innovating and transforming the conditions of life itself. Adaptation has demanded the courage to let go of what no longer serves us while preserving what defines us.
From the Convention’s ultimate objective to the Paris Agreement’s
long-term resilience goal, from the Global Goal on Adaptation (GGA) to National
Adaptation Plans (NAPs), COP30 must
be the COP of adaptation. Adaptation
ambition and action will be key to advancing in Belém our three priorities: (i)
strengthening multilateralism; (ii) connecting the climate regime to people’s
daily lives; and (iii) accelerating
climate implementation.
A Dangerous Precedent in Human Evolution
In my first letter, I mentioned we are entering a perilous era in which the wealthy – in both developed and developing nations – insulate themselves behind climate-resilient walls while the poor are left exposed. Such a future must be rejected outright. It is unethical, immoral, and ultimately self-destructive, for it corrodes the very cooperation that has made human evolution possible. Still, we see signs of this dystopian scenario emerging as a trend.
Unprecedented data from the 2025 Global Multidimensional Poverty Index, published by the United Nations Development Programme on 17 October, show that 1.1 billion of 6.3 billion people in 109 countries live in acute multidimensional poverty – over half of them children. Of those 1.1 billion, 887 million live in regions already facing at least one major climate hazard, and 309 million face three or more hazards simultaneously. Empathy compels us to see the human faces behind these figures – families displaced by floods, farmers watching fields wither, children walking miles for water, small and micro entrepreneurs losing their business and dreams.
Without adaptation, climate change becomes a poverty multiplier, dismantling livelihoods, displacing workers and deepening hunger. As impacts intensify, failure to act is not technical negligence; it is a political choice about who lives and who dies. African philosopher Achille Mbembe denounced this logic as “necropolitics” – the use of power to decide whose lives are protected and whose are expendable. As policymakers and political actors we are all no less responsible for acts of omission.
Adaptation is as essential to safeguarding economies as it is to protecting lives. Climate-related disasters already cost Africa between 2 and 5% of GDP each year. Across Small Island Developing States (SIDS), a single hurricane can erase years of progress, as shown by the devastation caused by Cyclone Freddy in parts of the Indian Ocean and the Caribbean. In Least Developed Countries (LDCs), recurrent droughts and floods – from the Sahel to the Horn of Africa and Southeast Asia – undermine food security, strain public finances, and reverse hard- won development gains. In Latin American countries too, climate impacts have been exacerbating inequalities and increasing vulnerabilities.
These are not only environmental crises; they are fiscal warnings, social fractures, and systemic risks to global stability. Inaction on adaptation cascades into instability with global repercussions over the medium and long term. At the same time, domestic resources that could be directed to low-carbon, climate-resilient transitions are increasingly consumed by emergency responses. As adaptation gaps widen, the growing burden of loss and damage further erodes fiscal space for long-term investment, especially in developing countries.
Adaptation Underfunded and Undervalued
In recent months, I have listened to voices
from all walks of life – Indigenous communities, scientists, economists, civil society, mayors,
small farmers, entrepreneurs, insurers, youth, and public servants. This learning process
has included inspiring dialogues under the Global Ethical Stocktake, led by Minister Marina Silva. From Latin America and Africa to
the Pacific and Southeast Asia, momentum is growing: renewable energy, policy
reforms, nature-based solutions, and grass-roots adaptation are multiplying.
A single message echoes
everywhere: a call for urgency and tangible outcomes on adaptation at COP30. People do not speak in acronyms; they speak of flooded homes and failed
harvests, local economies collapsing
after storms, schools and hospitals destroyed,
women leading community responses. Behind each story is the same reality:
climate impacts are eroding
development gains, widening inequality, and pushing millions back into
poverty.
We must break
this vicious cycle. Adaptation is
not an alternative to development – it is the essence of sustainable development in a climate-changing world.
It strengthens fiscal
stability, reduces investment risk,
and enhances productivity. Every resilient road,
every climate-proofed school,
every early-warning system pays back in avoided losses. The World Bank
estimates that robust adaptation measures can yield up to four times their cost
in economic benefits. Adaptation finance, therefore, must not be seen as
assistance alone.
Despite successive commitments, adaptation finance
still represents less than one-third
of total climate finance, far below needs. Chronic underinvestment leaves countries exposed, forcing scarce resources away from health, education, and infrastructure toward emergency
response and recovery. The imbalance
between mitigation and adaptation weakens collective resilience and perpetuates structural inequalities. Many communities already undertake local, experimental adaptation, but efforts are too often under-recognized, under-financed, and
poorly connected to national planning.
Elevating Adaptation – At All Levels
Sustainable development and combating poverty,
hunger, and inequalities are indispensable to
adaptation, because social
cohesion and strong
institutions are the greatest drivers
of resilience. While many
countries and communities are already undertaking the transition towards low- carbon and sustainable economies, the rise of an adaptation economy that shapes
new pathways for
climate-positive growth and development is still to be seen. Further efforts are needed to fully mainstream adaptation into the wider economic transition we are all
facing, ensuring that preventive
behaviors and resilience remain at the heart of economic policies, procurement
practices and new financial incentive mechanisms. Nature-based solutions and climate- biodiversity synergies can
accelerate this shift: investing in forests,
wetlands, mangroves, and
other ecosystems protects nature and builds resilient, climate-smart economies.
Elevating
adaptation also requires a strategic mix of financial instruments and stronger international cooperation. In
my travels, I repeatedly heard that accelerating
adaptation finance is essential to
protect communities and secure development gains – and that finance must be scaled up beyond doubling, potentially
tripling, to meet urgent needs. Grants
and concessional loans remain essential for all countries, especially those with limited
fiscal space, including for
developing and implementing NAPs.
I urge
countries and institutions to increase
the quantity and quality of adaptation finance, ensuring it reaches the most
vulnerable. For developed countries, adaptation finance is a smart investment that yields global
stability and domestic benefits. For developing countries, adaptation brings results that can attract
investment and avoids far larger costs tomorrow: it saves lives, safeguards jobs, protects infrastructure, and reduces inequality. It further prepares
these countries for sound mitigation efforts.
I also heard concerns about an
expanding role for the private sector in adaptation finance. These concerns
must be addressed while exploring
innovative approaches – such as guarantees
and blended finance to de-risk
investments and crowd in capital for resilient infrastructure, food systems and
water security.
Sovereign and subnational resilience bonds are channeling domestic savings to priorities; debt- for-resilience swaps and loss-and-damage
insurance ease fiscal pressures and speed up recovery; results-based finance and revolving funds improve accountability and ensure sustained impact. Country platforms and
Climate Prosperity Plans help align investments with national strategies. Multilateral development
banks, national development institutions and climate funds – including the Green Climate Fund, the
Least Developed Countries Fund, the
Climate Investment Funds, and the Adaptation Fund – play central roles in
deploying these instruments and aligning them with national priorities.
Effective
adaptation similarly depends on strong
multilevel governance that bridges global commitments and local realities.
Municipalities and state governments are on the front lines and
often the first responders. They feel the daily pressure when food is scarce,
water unavailable or heat waves strain health services. Their leadership is
essential to translate frameworks into concrete
protection for communities, small
business, infrastructure, and livelihoods. Integrating adaptation into local development plans, and ensuring
capacity and finance for subnational
authorities, makes action more effective, participatory, and people- centred.
A Turning Point on Adaptation at COP30
As noted in my first letter, a
major inflection on adaptation at
COP30 is essential to align the climate regime with daily
realities while reinforcing multilateralism and accelerating the implementation
of the Paris Agreement.
COP30 marks the first COP with the Paris Agreement policy cycle fully in motion. I welcome the
secretariat’s 21 October report on Progress in the process to formulate and
implement national adaptation plans, which shows a decisive shift from
conceptualization and planning to consolidation and implementation. This
picture can help move the climate regime from negotiation to implementation,
acknowledge both progress and gaps, and build on the first Global Stocktake as
we prepare for the second, to be concluded in 2028. As of 30
September 2025, 144 developing
countries had initiated and launched
the NAP process, and 67 developing
countries – including 23 LDCs and 14
SIDS – had submitted their NAPs to
the UNFCCC, along with 11 developed countries. I commend these countries and invite others to join this emerging chain of collective resilience, for our international
community is only as strong as its most vulnerable link.
With the NAP synthesis as background, several adaptation
issues will be central at COP30: (i) finalizing
the assessment of NAP progress,
evaluating findings, and agreeing on follow-up steps; (ii) advancing the Baku Adaptation Roadmap (BAR)
to accelerate GGA delivery through concrete steps,; (iii) clarifying how we will collectively close the
adaptation-finance gap; and (iv) delivering on the GGA and its operationalization through the UAE–Belém Work Programme, with concrete,
measurable indicators to track enhanced adaptive capacity,
strengthened resilience, and reduced vulnerability.
The GGA is not merely a negotiation item – it is an economic and moral compass. It guides us to act together, scale up local successes globally and integrate adaptation into national policies and fiscal planning. Finance ministers and development banks must treat adaptation as a core policy instrument, not as charity.
Beyond negotiations, the COP30
Climate Action Agenda must showcase real solutions so that Belém is also remembered as the COP of adaptation implementation. We invite all
initiatives to bring their best
solutions and highest ambition to close
gaps in policies and practice – for example, in health, food security, water management, adaptation finance, cities and regions,
infrastructure, small and micro business, among
others.
COP30 takes
place at the epicentre of the climate crisis. Yet from rising waters and changing
skies, a deeper strength is emerging – the determination of people to protect what they love. In Belém, let us honour
that determination and transform it into a global agenda
guided by care, not indifference; by
interdependence, not individualism; by courage, not resignation. In Belém, where
the rivers meet the
sea, let us renew the alliance between humanity
and nature – turning vulnerability into solidarity, cooperation into resilience, and adaptation into evolution.
Changing by choice, together.
André Aranha Corrêa do Lago COP30 President Designate
Please refer to the Portuguese version available at https://cop30.br/pt-br/presidencia-da-cop30/cartas-da- presidencia/oitava-carta-da-presidencia-brasileira
Please refer to the Spanish version available at https://cop30.br/es/presidencia/cartas-de-la-presidencia/octava-
Comments
Post a Comment